No Suspicious Circumstances
I can’t begin to express my utter distaste for the way the New Zealand press handles reporting on suicide. Articles in the press here, no matter whether it’s about someone found in a car on a remote hillside with a length of hose between tailpipe and passenger compartment, alone in the bath with a toaster or knife – are reported using one of a collection of standard euphemisms to ‘disguise’ the fact someone took his or her own life. “No suspicious circumstances,” they say “Police are not looking for anyone else in connection with the matter,” are but two of a seemingly endless database of ridiculous standards used here. Why stand on ceremony? Why not just take the whole theme to its absurd conclusion: “A Police spokesman said in connection that they had found their man.” “The killer was found at the scene.” “A Local Police source said on condition of anonymity that this was a one-man murder.” Seriously – it’s a serious matter, a fucking heartbreakingly serious matter but didn’t we discover some many decades ago that not talking about something doesn’t make it go away?
Here’s the thing: it’s not like the NZ press don’t get the opportunity to report self-inflicted deaths – in 2007, 483 people took their own lives in New Zealand and 2670 people were hospitalized as a result of self-inflicted injuries. People from low socio-economic backgrounds are 3 times more likely to be the inflicters than the ones most reporters come from. If you’re Maori, 16.1 of you per 100,000 will kill yourself vs 9.9 per 100,000 for non-Maori population. The statistics are absolutely shocking and this is just the tip of the shock. So, to underscore - people in New Zealand definitely kill themselves: more pro capita, in fact, than the U.S., The U.K., Australia and, uh, Haiti?!
One official line has it that “media reports of suicide may increase the risk of further suicides for a period of time after that suicide.”
“May” is the only word I really give any creedence to in that whole sentence. There is, to date, nothing conclusive anywhere to back this theory up apart from the supportive results of ‘discussions’ between the media and suicide stat gatherers paid by the government. I wonder whether, if the media stopped mentioning a soccer team being shit, that team would suddenly become league-toppers? Perhaps we might want to give this fantastical method a go at some other unsurmountable social ill…say, cancer?
As someone who has experienced the complete devastation that suicide leaves in its wake, I abhor the head in the sand approach whether its in the press or among friends. Believe me when I say that nobody is comfortable talking about suicide. People say “I don’t know what to say” more often than you can handle hearing it. And that is often all they say. It’s an excruciatingly hard topic to broach and so nobody really does. Even your best friends and closest family are completely useless to you in the wake of suicide. But the accompanying silence definitely does not make it any easier.
I tried the not talking about it method myself for a couple of years. Were they good times? Was suicide rendered any easier to be around for keeping schtum? They were the most difficult and gut-wrenchingly, heartbreakingly sad years of my life, to be frank about it and I wanted more than anything to talk about it with someone. Anyone. I just didn’t know anyone I thought might want to talk about it. Oh I had a million and one fucking questions I wanted to ask: mostly of the one person who would never answer any more questions, but I’d have settled for anyone at all – a stranger even. I wanted to talk and talk and talk about suicide but it was three years before I found any help. When I did find it, I also found out it was the only Government funded bereavement counselling service for survivors of suicide in the whole of New Zealand. It’s in Wellington and God bless the people who run it – each and every one of them has been affected personally by suicide. They struggle every year to retain their funding, they want to expand to Auckland and Christchurch and everywhere else but they have to struggle to keep their one little program afloat. Do you think that the press not reporting suicide might be helping their cause?
It’s despicable logic and thank God someone in power has finally challenged it and said what nobody else is saying. While the press prattles on every single long weekend about “killer roads” and “deadly traffic tolls,” the bedroom light fixtures and rooftops and razorblades and pills and high bridges of this country kill more than double the amount of every thoroughfare put together.
Might the act of suicide be sensationalized? Glamorized? Made fanciable by truthful reporting? That’s the stupidest fucking thing I’ve ever heard. People thinking about taking their own lives need no encouragement. They don’t take their own lives because its glamorous. They’re not scouring the press looking for ideas and methodology. No depressed person needs tips on how to take their life, for Chrissakes. You can kill yourself with a screwdriver. A person that deep in darkness needs, more than anything, to be confronted with the indelible, undoable harm that their non-presence in the lives of the people who love them is going to cause. If a single suicidal person in ten years read an article featuring the heartbroken words of a parent or loved one left behind and found the strength to not go through with it as a result – that alone would be enough to justify an upturn of these backward-assed rules. Shame on the New Zealand press for not only being pretty much terrible and broadsheet-sized tabloids, quality-wise, but for not ever challenging this absurdism in its own rule book. The sooner people start talking about suicide for real, the better for everyone.















